Home
FAQ
Search
Register
Log inYou better cheer …. or you might be next.
Page 5 of 5•
Page 5 of 5 • 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Stephanie on Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:46 pm
Aaron wrote:Take it up with Congress and the UN Frank. They're the one's that found Sadaam guilty.
Maybe you can use that proof you got that Bush lied and get him impeached while your at it.
Confused about what? How our President laid out his plans and received the support of both the world community and the United States community, both political and private, and did only what he was authorized to do?
Nope, I'm pretty sure that's how it happened. No confusion here.
No trial, Aaron......you're confused......or your twisting the facts to suit your purpose.
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Aaron on Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:34 pm
GWB took his case to the UN Security Council and they unanimously passed UN Resolution 1441.
He took his case to the US Congress and they passed by over 70%, public law 107-243 authorizing the Iraq War.
It doesn't matter what you call it, GWB followed procedures, which YOU agreed with. No confusion and no purpose here. Just plain simple facts.
He took his case to the US Congress and they passed by over 70%, public law 107-243 authorizing the Iraq War.
It doesn't matter what you call it, GWB followed procedures, which YOU agreed with. No confusion and no purpose here. Just plain simple facts.
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
JFK-1960
JFK-1960
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Stephanie on Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:59 pm
He was deceptive. He should be ashamed of himself. Unfortunately, it would appear, like other despots before him, GWB has no shame.
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Aaron on Tue Jul 01, 2008 8:04 pm
How was he deceptive?
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
JFK-1960
JFK-1960
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Stephanie on Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:19 pm
He insisted Saddam Hussein had WMD and he was hiding them from UN Weapons Inspectors. That wasn't truthful.
He insisted Saddam Hussein posed an imminent threat to America and Americans. That wasn't truthful.
He insisted Saddam Hussein posed an imminent threat to America and Americans. That wasn't truthful.
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Aaron on Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:54 am
Bearing in mind that you've just expressed an opinion. If there were proof of what you say, GWB would have been impeached a long time ago.
The facts are, the consensus of the worlds intelligence agencies was that Sadaam Hussein had WMD's and hid them from weapons inspectors. That is a belief that Sadaam perpetuated to keep Iran, among others, at bay.
And yes, he was a threat to America. He invaded Kuwait because an official from Kuwait upset him. He hated GB Sr and America and blamed us for the reduced role Iraq played in the Middle East. Sam is right in that sooner or later, we would have had to deal with Sadaam Hussein. I don't disagree with that. I disagreed with the why and questioned the when part of it. I felt like, and still do, the pre-emptive strike was not reason enough for American action at that time.
I also felt Iraq was fairly well contained in 2003. Sooner or later though, Sadaam would have done something that would have justified American intervention though. It was a matter of time.
The facts are, the consensus of the worlds intelligence agencies was that Sadaam Hussein had WMD's and hid them from weapons inspectors. That is a belief that Sadaam perpetuated to keep Iran, among others, at bay.
And yes, he was a threat to America. He invaded Kuwait because an official from Kuwait upset him. He hated GB Sr and America and blamed us for the reduced role Iraq played in the Middle East. Sam is right in that sooner or later, we would have had to deal with Sadaam Hussein. I don't disagree with that. I disagreed with the why and questioned the when part of it. I felt like, and still do, the pre-emptive strike was not reason enough for American action at that time.
I also felt Iraq was fairly well contained in 2003. Sooner or later though, Sadaam would have done something that would have justified American intervention though. It was a matter of time.
Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
JFK-1960
JFK-1960
Last edited by Aaron on Wed Jul 02, 2008 5:08 am; edited 1 time in total
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by SheikBen on Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:52 am
Stephanie wrote:He insisted Saddam Hussein had WMD and he was hiding them from UN Weapons Inspectors. That wasn't truthful.
He insisted Saddam Hussein posed an imminent threat to America and Americans. That wasn't truthful.
Being wrong is not the same as being deceptive
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by ziggy on Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:57 am
Being wrong is not the same as being deceptive
Mike, do you think that Bush believed all that he was saying about Iraq and Saddam Hussein in the weeks and months leading up to the March 2003 invasion of Iraq?
The government consists of a gang of men who, taking one with another, have no special talent for the business of government; they have only a talent for getting and holding office.
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by Stephanie on Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:26 am
Michael,
So you really believe Bush & Co. were being totally up front with the UN, Congress, and/or the American people?
So you really believe Bush & Co. were being totally up front with the UN, Congress, and/or the American people?
Legitimate use of violence can only be that which is required in self-defense.
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
-Ron Paul
When one gets in bed with government, one must expect the diseases it spreads.
-Ron Paul
The moral and constitutional obligations of our representatives in Washington are to protect our liberty, not coddle the world, precipitating no-win wars, while bringing bankruptcy and economic turmoil to our people.
-Ron Paul
Re: You better cheer …. or you might be next.
by SamCogar on Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:27 am
Didn't Colin Powell address the UN on that subject?
Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5