T'was bad month for Global Warminists

Aaron wrote:Have you looked at and studied the science from those who do not believe in GW or have you simply dismissed it and accepted GW science as gospel?

Comrade.

DUH, ..... accepts the "Al Gore" GW science as gospel, ...... just ask her.

Linda's friend the "30 year" expert has done told her everything she needs to know.

.

Ah yes here it is again. My friend was right. Long posts with giant letters intended to dominate the person disagreeing with you and the forum at the same time. Then doing the same to the second person disagreeing with you. My friend is batting 1000. Right so far on every single count. You SamCoger are an individual with a very serious problem. Just as he says that you are. You have proven him absolutely right. None of your arguments make even a little bit of sense any longer. Now it is about refusing to admit you are wrong and he will be right again. Perfect batting average. Darn that's why he's considered one of the very best at what he does. Oh and Sam you taunted Terry about being a man. You don't really call how you act being a man do you? All that nasty, bullying condescending arrogant behavior is as far from true manhood as it gets. My Father and my uncles nor my brother would never have acted as you do. And they are all right to the last one hardworking MEN who also do work for charity and know how to treat people. They are all men. You are an immature child.

Why are you ignoring Sam's question on the other thread Linda? That's the problem I have with liberals like you. If you don't like or can't provide the answer, you ignore the question.

It's truly sad Comrade.

What thread are you talking about Aaron? And Sam ignores things all the time.

This one Linda...

Sam ask what I believe is a legitimate question.

Now Linda Lou, you best discuss it with Katie Curic and TerryRC before you try to explain why 40 years of melting has caused a 52% increase in polar bears.

I frankly do not know the answer to that question. I do know however that 25,000 is not a large number worldwide. And 40 years of melting? From what source. Because I don't accept that without seeing it, and who it is. I certainly do not believe Sam. Not a thing he says.

It seems to me Aaron that you talk about other people taking the party line. What is it you are doing? Reading the Gospel of Sam? That is definately how it appears. And Sam keeps saying bolts from crossbows. What about arrows? How many different size bolts? Back to the research. Do you do any or do you just follow Sam?

Aaron I have already begun the research. I will have the answer to that question tomorrow. No doubt. Then we'll watch Sam dance around the issue, change the subject, and insult people to divert their attention away from his usual erroneous conclusions.

Read the source yourself and decide if it's credible Linda. It's been there for nearly 2 days and you've had plenty of chances to look at it yourself. You are you capable of doing that, are't you?

lindaredtail wrote:Ah yes here it is again. My friend was right. Long posts with giant letters intended to dominate the person ........

Linda, your "psycho babble" is beginning to bore me to tears and hair pulling.

Linda, you are accusing me of what you are intent on doing. And I believe that is called, ....... in your lingo, ....... "transference". ...... RIGHT, ...... Linda Lou.

Sure nuff, Linda Lulu, ..... sure nuff, to wit:

Transference is a phenomenon in psychology characterized by unconscious redirection of feelings for one person to another. One definition of transference is "the inappropriate repetition in the present of a relationship that was important in a person's childhood.

The unconscious assignment to others of feelings and attitudes that were originally associated with important figures (parents, siblings, etc.) in one's early life. The transference may be negative or positive.

Attitudes, feelings, thoughts and wishes that involve important figures in the past are unconsciously re-enacted with individuals (therapist, medical staff, physician and SamCogar) in the present.

Here Linda, click on this url, .... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ .... or any of the urls cited by said, .... noting all "long posts" and all the various font sizes and colors, ...... then Linda, .... tell all of us who the intended persons are that each "posting" was attempting TO DOMINATE.

Linda, for one who claims learned expertise in the field of Psychology, ....... you sure as hell DON'T KNOW A DAMN THING ..... about the psychology that "drives" the media, publishing and advertising businesses.

GEEEEZUS, gal, ....... smarten up, ......... quit being a prole and educate yourself. All the various text-editors and word-processors available for you PC ....... DO NOT provide all the various font types, font sizes, font colors, etc. .... for the sole purpose of the writers domination over those WHO TAKE TIME TO READ THEIR WRITING.

lindaredtail wrote:.......... dominate the person disagreeing with you and the forum at the same time. Then doing the same to the second person disagreeing with you.

Silly, naieve female you are. It is ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE to dominate a person "at a distance" ..... by badmouthing or berating them via voice or text.

lindaredtail wrote:My friend is batting 1000. Right so far on every single count.

Yes, ...... and how many times per week does he ...... "make a homerun" with his base loaded?

lindaredtail wrote:You SamCoger are an individual with a very serious problem. Just as he says that you are. You have proven him absolutely right.

Linda, am I suppose to respond with ..... "There is an old fellow on the island of Borneo that said the same thing about you and your friend. You have proven him absolutely right."

Linda, this is an "open forum" and new members are welcome to join. So, your friend 'John' has a right to 'speak for himself'. Thus I suggest, implore, that you extend your friend an invitation to "join this form" ... then he can defend all the bullshidt that he has been feeding you. Nourishing "mushroom growth" is not so easy herein.

lindaredtail wrote:None of your arguments make even a little bit of sense any longer. Now it is about refusing to admit you are wrong and he will be right again. Perfect batting average.

Good, ..... another "home run" ...... and without the cost of a bottle of Chianti.

Linda, you have yet to read any of my arguments in order to pass judgment on their content/context. You have done little more than "comparison checking" of my posts for any disagreements in what you perceive to be Politically Correct.

lindaredtail wrote:Darn that's why he's considered one of the very best at what he does.

Yes Linda Lou, and if you visit any Public School you will see most all the Teachers standing around ....... patting each other on the back and telling one another what a great and wonderful job they are doing. ps: that is oft called a "circle pat" or a "circle jerk".

lindaredtail wrote:Oh and Sam you taunted Terry about being a man. You don't really call how you act being a man do you?

Well Linda, in the case of TerryRC, ........ "NO", .... I'm acting more like a Father should act reguarding the nurturing of his children.

lindaredtail wrote:All that nasty, bullying condescending arrogant behavior is as far from true manhood as it gets. My Father and my uncles nor my brother would never have acted as you do.

Well "DUH", is it any wonder then that you and TerryRC ...... act so much alike?

lindaredtail wrote:And they are all right to the last one hardworking MEN who also do work for charity and know how to treat people. They are all men. You are an immature child.

Linda Lou, letta me give you a clue.

Anyone that works as a psychiatrists, psychologist, in social services or for charities, ...... HAVE TO TREAT PEOPLE THAT WAY ......... or they won't be working at that job very long.

And Linda Lou, ....... that is a "Catch 22" scenario.

I say that because many of the people who need and receive said “services” couldn’t make it “as something else” ….. and oftentimes become “the providers” of said services to others in need.

And those who start out providing said services would be hard pressed to find a different line of work ……. and if they lost said job many would then require the “services” of those who still have such a job.

A "Catch 22", ...... Linda Lou.

And ps: My inclusion of "Lou" or "Lulu" with your name is assuredly more PC and less "image provoking" than what you included.

.

As always you show just how ignorant that you are SamCoger. Why do you think there are laws now being passed against cyber-bullying? And why do you think that a woman from Missouri has now been indicted for FELONIES in cyber crimes? I will be interested in your usual two bit full of garbage totally erroneous explanation to things you show repeatedly that you have no comprehension of whatsoever. All these news laws are for people just like you. Because before you would do this to somone in person you'd run for it. Because in reality you are a coward. That is what bullies are cowards. And you fit the profile to a T. And Sam do you think for some reason that maybe available font sizes, colors, ect. perhaps were meant for projects online, business websites huh. Anything can be misused from its intent. That argument shows just what a twit you really are.

Oh and that 40 year warming period of yours Aaron so loves to quote . I'm doing some research. Right now it says ocean temperature. Not surface, or air, or overall planetary temperature. Time to start picking apart all these little "supposed" brilliant sciencific arguments of yours and seeing what they really say. One at a time.

Oh and Sam you have been boring me to tears since day one. With your foolish ridiculous arguments that all fall in line with the right wingers and the American Petroleum Institute. You say other people don"t think for themselves but I go on other forums as well. And you sound exactly like every other extremist right winger that I have across. If i interchanged your name with some of theirs no one could tell the difference. (Except those like my friend) There is not one original thought in any thing that you write and you are the sheep you tell other people that they The number of entries that sound just like you (except most of them have space limits) And no oversized fonts either. Why the number is very huge and increasing daily I am sure.

lindaredtail wrote:It seems to me Aaron that you talk about other people taking the party line. What is it you are doing? Reading the Gospel of Sam? That is definately how it appears.

And Sam keeps saying bolts from crossbows. What about arrows? How many different size bolts? Back to the research. Do you do any or do you just follow Sam?

AAAAWWWWW ..... Linda Lou, ........ you creditability is approaching that of whale feces.

And no one pays any attention to whale feces ...... because it is all at the bottom of the ocean.

Now Linda Lou, here immediately following is a url reference to Medieval Terms.

http://www.renaissancemagazine.com/glossary/glossaryb.html

Did you see it Linda, it is in blue font with an "http://" as the first characters ... and if you place your cursor on said, the cursor "arrow" will change to a "finger pointing hand". Linda, that "finger pointing hand" isa telling you "this is an Internet link to a Web site", ...... which mean iffen you "click" your mouse button it will magically download information from said Web site.

Now Linda Lou, here immediately following is a "hyper text" url reference to the same Medieval Terms site.

Medieval Terms

Do you see it Linda. Now, I included bold type and underline so ya wouldn't miss it. And Linda, it acts the same as the way I described the one above it, OK.

And Linda, iffen you click on either one of them, a list of Medieval Terms will magically appear, ....... and then if you look down said list you will find this entry for bolts, OK. To wit:

BOLTS, CROSSBOW: Shortened arrows used in arbalests; small stocky missiles know for being capable of incredible penetration.

Linda, the projectile fired via a crossbow is called a "bolt", ..... not an "arrow", ..... kapish, ....... understand.

And Linda baby, in that you asked, ...... "How many different size bolts?", ......... I have wasted more of my valuable time to provide another reference to answer your question because I damn well know you wouldn't believe a f'ing word I said ....... because you are an ... an .... a typical "Sexual Harassment Female" who will deviously and dishonestly accuse any male that pisses you off ...... with any type or form of misdeed that you can think up. Your emotional state overrides any possibility of any logical or reasonable thoughts.

And here is that reference, to wit:

http://www.crossbows-bolts.com/crossbow-bolts.php

.

Sam sometimes you should watch what you ask for. www.newsmax.com/insidecover/polar_bear_inhofe/2008/05/15/96302.html I'm sure Sam that you know who Mr. Inhofe is. One of those Republican darlings. Well very recently he had something to say which answers your question and quite tidily too. You see he doesn't support GW nor any of the data either just like you. He opposed the idea of the polar bear being put on the endangered species list. He listed why he believes that the polar bear has done so well these last 40 years and I quote. Inhofe said "that the credit for the INCREASE IN NUMBERS should be given to protection already provided to the polar bear by way of the Marine Mammals Protection Act, the several international conservation treaties, including the 1973 Agreement on the Conservation of the Polar Bears, and the U.S.-Russia Polar Bear Conservation and Management Act of 2006 as well as conservation, education and outreach agreements with native peoples." That from a staunch conservative. Sounds like he is saying Sam that it isn't a natural phenomenon due to rising temperatures. ALL THOSE THINGS HE LISTED ARE GOVERNMENTS ,PRIVATE AND PUBLIC AGENCIES IN OTHER WORDS PEOPLE WHO HAVE HELPED THE POLAR BEAR INCREASE IN NUMBERS. Now I'll be waiting for the false rationalizations, the verbal dance, the attempt at a snow job, the bully pulpit as you try to get around this one.