CO2 causing AGW is a flim-flamming Junk Science

View previous topic View next topic Go down

CO2 causing AGW is a flim-flamming Junk Science

Post by SamCogar on Fri Sep 28, 2012 8:06 am

It is devious, dishonest, disingenuous “junk science” for the proponents of AGW to claim that non-cloud H2O vapor (humidity) is a heat-trapping “greenhouse” gas …. and then refuse to include the quantity of heat that it “traps” when calculating surface temperatures.

It is devious, dishonest, disingenuous “junk science” for the proponents of AGW to claim that the thermal energy (heat) “feedback” from the recent 100 ppm increase in/of the current 395 ppm of atmospheric CO2 is the primary cause of the recent 1F increase in surface temperatures …. but then refuse to consider the thermal energy (heat) “feedback” from a 10,000 or a 25,000 ppm increase in atmospheric H2O vapor when calculating increases in surface temperatures.

If as the proponents of AGW claim, …. that it is a science fact that 395 ppm of CO2 will affect the surface temperature on any given day, …… then it is also a scientific fact that the above said 25,000 ppm of H2O vapor will affect the surface temperature on any given day.

And based on their Specific Heat Capacity, ….. the warming effect caused by the above said 25,000 ppm of H2O vapor will be approximately 146 times greater than the warming effect caused by 395 ppm of CO2. Thus it is utterly foolish for the proponents of AGW to claim “uncertainty” about the water vapor feedback mechanism as their reason for refusing to include the warming effect of H2O vapor (humidity) when calculating surface temperatures.

All warming effect is the result of the thermal (IR) energy that is being absorbed and re-radiated by the molecules of H2O and CO2 that are currently residing in the atmosphere at any given time ….. and has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with how many days, weeks, months or years they have been resident in the atmosphere or what entity caused them to be in the atmosphere.

There is no known entity in the universe that “traps” thermal energy other than the per say Black Hole at centers of galaxies.

“Greenhouse” gases do not “trap” thermal energy, …. they absorb thermal energy from a point source and then almost immediately start radiating that thermal energy in all circumferential directions. (Said molecules are like incandescent light bulbs.) Said molecules will only increase in temperature if they are absorbing said energy at a faster pace than they are dissipating said energy.

Now H2O vapor is a “heat trapping greenhouse gas” the same as CO2 or neither one of them are “heat trapping greenhouse gases” ….. and the proponents of AGW can not selectively choose the “time & place” that H2O vapor is and isn’t. But that is exactly what they have been doing.

SamCogar

Number of posts : 6238
Location : Burnsville, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum