Betchya can't do it, Sam.

Judy wrote:I think there's a difference of me posting my opinion of BMD, or you for that matter and of him posting a picture that is clearly offensive and is posted for that very reason.

Can you not see the difference?

Which picture, Judy?

My words are pointed at one individual and are normally spot on as they are with Dick. If you can't see the difference then that's your shortcoming.

Judy wrote:My words are pointed at one individual and are normally spot on as they are with Dick. If you can't see the difference then that's your shortcoming.

Judy,

I had no idea you cared sooooooo much.

Aaron wrote:My words are pointed at one individual and are normally spot on as they are with Dick. If you can't see the difference then that's your shortcoming.

It's not a "shortcoming" at all- as you admit that it's just about your opinion anyway. My or BMDs failure to agree with your mere "opinion"- or your failure to agree with mine or his, is not a shortcoming. It is just a difference of opinion.

And BMD's cartoon about Jesus is no less "spot on" than your words about BMD or anyone else. You have not even tried to refute BMD's assertion of Jesus' genetic makeup. Why not?

ziggy wrote:And BMD's cartoon about Jesus is no less "spot on" than your words about BMD. You have not even tried to refute BMD's assertion of Jesus' genetic makeup. Why not?

I'm not sure that Judy understands the argument behind that pic.

ziggy wrote:

Aaron wrote:My words are pointed at one individual and are normally spot on as they are with Dick. If you can't see the difference then that's your shortcoming.

It's not a "shortcoming" at all- as you admit that it's just about your opinion anyway. My or BMDs failure to agree with your mere "opinion"- or your failure to agree with mine or his, is not a shortcoming. It is just a difference of opinion.

And BMD's cartoon about Jesus is no less "spot on" than your words about BMD or anyone else. You have not even tried to refute BMD's assertion of Jesus' genetic makeup. Why not?

Aren't you the one the edited and deleted numerous post, going so far as to call one slanderous, just so a member of this forum would not be offended Frank?

You have zero credibility.

I am not the one trying to get anyone to change their signature line. You are. So it is YOU who needs credibility.

The only person here lacking in credibility here, other then you Frank is BMD and like you, the reason he lacks credibility is based on his own actions.

It was he who whined about being called him William and said I wasn't respecting rules of netiquette and it was he who referenced and provided a link to the rules.

And those very rules BMD referenced said that not only should one respect others identity whine they choose to remain anonymous, it also states individuals shouldn't post pictures, quotes or other items which are offensive to others.

All I was doing was pointing out that if BMD is going to whine about one netiquette rule then he should at least have the decency to respect the others considering it was he who brought the rules into the conversation to begin with and that by failing to do was hypocritical.

So do you not think BMD should live by the rules he's referencing or is he exempt from abiding by the rules and why?

Aaron wrote:... BMD ... BMD ... BMD ... BMD ...

O.K., Aaron. "Apology" accepted.

We'll call it even on the name issue.

Don't flatter yourself. There is no apology.

You show what type of person you are every time you post.

We all know it, including Frank. Were it any other poster saying what I said, he would have remained silent.

Aaron wrote:Don't flatter yourself. There is no apology.

Sure, Aaron. What ever you say.

Aaron wrote:You show what type of person you are every time you post.

Smarter than the average Forest Ranger?

bmd wrote:

Aaron wrote:You show what type of person you are every time you post.

Smarter than the average Forest Ranger?

I'd put my money on the forest ranger.

Aaron wrote:

bmd wrote:

Aaron wrote:You show what type of person you are every time you post.

Smarter than the average Forest Ranger?

I'd put my money on the forest ranger.

Ahh!!! But who's got the pic-can-ic bass-kit????

You would be suprised about what post like this reveal about who and what you really are.

It confirms what I already knew.

Aaron wrote:You would be suprised about what post like this reveal about who and what you really are.

It confirms what I already knew.

Ya' got me, Aaron.

Hi, my name is bmd, and I'm a Hanna-Barbera fan.
(The first step is admitting your addiction.)

It's not the cartoon; it's the context. Someone supposedly as smart as you should know that.

.

"bump" from Page 3

SamCogar wrote:

bmd wrote:

Aaron wrote:I'd venture to say with your head up your ass as that's how you were when you came here.

Perhaps instead of tossing insults around, why don't you actually tell me why my reasoning is so wrong?

Well now, would ya look at that.

bmd is insisting that Aaron do ........ what bmd won't do himself.

Same ole shit from the hypocrites, ...........



.

Sam,

WTF are you talking about?

I can understand why BMD’s got feminine qualities now Sam considering he was raised by his mother and grandmother absent of male influence growing up.

Aaron wrote:I can understand why BMD’s got feminine qualities now Sam considering he was raised by his mother and grandmother absent of male influence growing up.

Huh?

bmd wrote:Sam,

WTF are you talking about?

bmd, pretending ignorance is not a viable CYA.

.

Sometimes you guys really do make me lmao. This is one of those times.

SamCogar wrote:

bmd wrote:Sam,

WTF are you talking about?

bmd, pretending ignorance is not a viable CYA.

.

At least I'm pretending, Sam.

No you're not pretending dick.

I believe he prefers "Richard."

Look, y'all, remember that we're here to have fun.

If someone is acting immature, put them on ignore for awhile and see if they get the hint.