Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
+3
Ich bin Ala-awkbarph
SheikBen
SamCogar
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
The Creationists are always telling the Evolutionists, …. “Not so”, ….. while the Evolutionists are always telling the Creationists, …… “It is so”.
And why is this you ask. Well now, a simple explanation will suffice.
It is because of the two completely opposite approaches used to understand and solve the mystery of the origin of life.
The Creationists chose humans, one of the most complex animals that has ever existed, as their “study specimen”. And what they found in said human “specimen” were so many complex and interactive parts and pieces that it boggled their mind and the only thing that they could possibly conclude is that their “specimen” had to have been “created” by a superior being or intelligent designer.
The Evolutionists chose the most simplest of all life forms as their “study specimens”. And what they found in said “specimens” were very simple parts and pieces that performed a specific function. And with their knowledge and understanding of the simple parts and pieces they next chose “specimens” whose parts and pieces were just a wee bit more complex and reasoned out how it was possible that the very simple parts and pieces could have evolved, via mutations, into the wee bit more complex parts and pieces of their new study “specimens”. And on and on, repeating the same procedure with more and more complex life forms.
Thus, when an Evolutions looks at another human, one of the most complex animals that has ever existed, he does not see a variety of complex and interactive parts and pieces that boggles his mind. He sees hundreds of simple parts and pieces that have evolved via mutations into the many complex and interactive parts and pieces that the human animal consists of.
If one wishes to become a building architect, they do not start by studying the construction of the Burj Dubai or the CN Tower in Toronto, they start by studying the construction of an 8’ by 10’ outbuilding.
cheers
.
And why is this you ask. Well now, a simple explanation will suffice.
It is because of the two completely opposite approaches used to understand and solve the mystery of the origin of life.
The Creationists chose humans, one of the most complex animals that has ever existed, as their “study specimen”. And what they found in said human “specimen” were so many complex and interactive parts and pieces that it boggled their mind and the only thing that they could possibly conclude is that their “specimen” had to have been “created” by a superior being or intelligent designer.
The Evolutionists chose the most simplest of all life forms as their “study specimens”. And what they found in said “specimens” were very simple parts and pieces that performed a specific function. And with their knowledge and understanding of the simple parts and pieces they next chose “specimens” whose parts and pieces were just a wee bit more complex and reasoned out how it was possible that the very simple parts and pieces could have evolved, via mutations, into the wee bit more complex parts and pieces of their new study “specimens”. And on and on, repeating the same procedure with more and more complex life forms.
Thus, when an Evolutions looks at another human, one of the most complex animals that has ever existed, he does not see a variety of complex and interactive parts and pieces that boggles his mind. He sees hundreds of simple parts and pieces that have evolved via mutations into the many complex and interactive parts and pieces that the human animal consists of.
If one wishes to become a building architect, they do not start by studying the construction of the Burj Dubai or the CN Tower in Toronto, they start by studying the construction of an 8’ by 10’ outbuilding.
cheers
.
SamCogar- Number of posts : 6238
Location : Burnsville, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
"And what they found in said “specimens” were very simple parts and pieces that performed a specific function."
I don't think that cells are very simple, do you?
I don't think that cells are very simple, do you?
SheikBen- Moderator
- Number of posts : 3445
Age : 48
Location : The Soviet Socialist Republic of Illinois
Registration date : 2008-01-02
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
SheikBen wrote:"And what they found in said “specimens” were very simple parts and pieces that performed a specific function."
I don't think that cells are very simple, do you?
Not for us Evolutionists that understand how complex they really are.
But for Creationists, most think more about a jail cell than they ever have or will about a biological cell.
And if you try to enlighten them on the latter, ....... it will "blow" their mind, not just "boggle" it.
.
SamCogar- Number of posts : 6238
Location : Burnsville, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
Sam,
Here is the view of a fellow West Virginian from Poca, WV. Perhaps you will find it interesting and enlightening:
http://www.insectman.us/evolution-is-a-lie/index.htm
Here is the view of a fellow West Virginian from Poca, WV. Perhaps you will find it interesting and enlightening:
http://www.insectman.us/evolution-is-a-lie/index.htm
Ich bin Ala-awkbarph- Number of posts : 2310
Age : 73
Location : The Caliphate of Zarr Chasmistan, WV
Registration date : 2008-01-28
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
Armon Ayers wrote:Sam,
Here is the view of a fellow West Virginian from Poca, WV. Perhaps you will find it interesting and enlightening:
http://www.insectman.us/evolution-is-a-lie/index.htm
OH MERCY, ........ and I wasa thinking "Aaron". That just hasta be Karl Priest's web site.
As a now retired math teacher, ...... he sure has proclaimed himself an anti-Evolution expert for several years now.
He sure has a problem with evolution ...... but I'm not sure what it is.
But then, ..... GEEEEEZE, ..... just about anyone that badmouths evolution ........ has a lot of "friends" in WV. He needs to be preaching his piffle from the pulpit ...... and he would probably "fill up" the Church on Sunday morning ........ and thus would surely garner a Sunday Morning Hour on Channel 8 and Channel 3 TV.
.
SamCogar- Number of posts : 6238
Location : Burnsville, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
SamCogar wrote:Armon Ayers wrote:Sam,
Here is the view of a fellow West Virginian from Poca, WV. Perhaps you will find it interesting and enlightening:
http://www.insectman.us/evolution-is-a-lie/index.htm
OH MERCY, ........ and I wasa thinking "Aaron". That just hasta be Karl Priest's web site.
As a now retired math teacher, ...... he sure has proclaimed himself an anti-Evolution expert for several years now.
He sure has a problem with evolution ...... but I'm not sure what it is.
But then, ..... GEEEEEZE, ..... just about anyone that badmouths evolution ........ has a lot of "friends" in WV. He needs to be preaching his piffle from the pulpit ...... and he would probably "fill up" the Church on Sunday morning ........ and thus would surely garner a Sunday Morning Hour on Channel 8 and Channel 3 TV.
.
Okay, Sam. I'll put you down as undecided.
Keli- Number of posts : 3608
Age : 73
Location : Zarr Chasm, WV--between Flotsam and Belch on the Cheat River
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
Priest's buddy, "Dr. Dino" (Kent Hovind), got his ass in a bind (linky clicky).
The creation science business must be lucrative.
The creation science business must be lucrative.
TerryRC- Number of posts : 2762
Registration date : 2008-01-05
Re: Solved: the Creationist – Evolutionist Argument
Those whom God would destroy, He first makes mad.
ohio county- Moderator
- Number of posts : 3207
Location : Wheeling
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Similar topics
» Evolutionist calls Creationist "Idiot"
» Mystery solved!
» The Angry Evolutionist
» Forgotten evolutionist lives in Darwin's shadow
» Three (3) scary Global Warming problems solved.
» Mystery solved!
» The Angry Evolutionist
» Forgotten evolutionist lives in Darwin's shadow
» Three (3) scary Global Warming problems solved.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum