Obama's SS?

Brown Shirts?

Armon Ayers wrote:Brown Shirts?

Context is everything, preacher.

This is from a speech way back in July. Why didn't our resident bible-thumper put this snippet into its proper context? Because the truth is anathema to Terry H.

Terry, try reading this THIS (or get someone to read it to you) and then tell us all to what Sen. Obama was actually referring. Or, are you so afraid of the truth that you can't bring yourself to examine it, or your prejudice, up close?

bmd wrote:

Armon Ayers wrote:Brown Shirts?

Context is everything, preacher.

This is from a speech way back in July. Why didn't our resident bible-thumper put this snippet into its proper context? Because the truth is anathema to Terry H.

Terry, try reading this THIS (or get someone to read it to you) and then tell us all to what Sen. Obama was actually referring. Or, are you so afraid of the truth that you can't bring yourself to examine it, or your prejudice, up close?

A civilian corp could handle the work building schools?

I guess you missed the part about "JUST AS POWERFUL"?

And "JUST AS WELL FUNDED" as the military? (Has he spoken to Bawney Fwanks about this funding?)

Where do you think he's going to get that money - and did you miss that he's calling it a National "SECURITY FORCE".?

Might be wise to read up on World History. Particularly German and Russian.

So, what is your native language? It's obviously NOT english.

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set," he said. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

I think some of you who support stuff like this need to go back and read out founding fathers thoughs on national defense and threats to this country, from outside as well as within.

I would suggest you actually try reading the constitution Billy. It might give you some insight that you don't find in the mass mailing put out by the DNC.

The Constitution doesn't interest or citizens like bmd or candidates like Barack Obama.

ANYONE who can look at the context of what Sen. Obama said in that speech and NOT realize that he was speaking metaphorically* is either too stupid or too disingenuous to carry on a meaningful debate.


*I know it's a big word, but even you morons can use a dictionary (can't you?).

bmd wrote:ANYONE who can look at the context of what Sen. Obama said in that speech and NOT realize that he was speaking metaphorically* is either too stupid or too disingenuous to carry on a meaningful debate.


*I know it's a big word, but even you morons can use a dictionary (can't you?).

And I suppose that you will next be telling us that all those black school dropouts that are supporting and/or voting for Obama ...... all have a dictionary, ..... know how to use it, ....... can spell the word "metaphorically", ....... knows exactly what it means ....... and knows that was the way Obama was speaking when he made that speech.

GEEEZUS, bmd, most all of Obama's black supporters would think ya was talking about a new "street drug" if ya mentioned the word "metaphorically" in their presence ......... and would probably want to know where to buy it.


.

People who speak, as you say, metaphorically, depend on a public too stupid to understand what their true meaning is who will make excuses for them when their true motive slips out from time to time.

Keep drinking the kool aid William.