The 2013 IPCC AR5 Report: Facts -vs- Fictions
Page 1 of 1
The 2013 IPCC AR5 Report: Facts -vs- Fictions
Exerted from: Guest essay by Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor of Geology, Western Washington University
Read more @ http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/03/the-2013-ipcc-ar5-report-facts-vs-fictions/#more-95072Mark Twain popularized the saying “There are liars, damn liars, and statisticians.” After reading the recently-released [IPCC AR5] report, we can now add, ‘there are liars, damn liars, and IPCC.” When compared to the also recently published NIPCC (Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change) 1000+-page volume of data on climate change with thousands of peer-reviewed references, the inescapable conclusion is that the IPCC report must be considered the grossest misrepresentation of data ever published.
As MIT climate scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen stated, “The latest IPCC report has truly sunk to the level of hilarious incoherence—it is quite amazing to see the contortions the IPCC has to go through in order to keep the international climate agenda going.”
SamCogar- Number of posts : 6238
Location : Burnsville, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Similar topics
» CONSENUS of scientists say IPCC should be scrapped
» The IPCC's CAGW 'Consensus of Opinion' of one (1) person
» 2013 DARWIN AWARDS
» The IPCC's CAGW 'Consensus of Opinion' of one (1) person
» 2013 DARWIN AWARDS
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum