WV Forum for News, Politics, and Sports
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he?

3 posters

Go down

A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he? Empty A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he?

Post by SamCogar Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:25 am

Administration changes rules for carbon dioxide

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration is imposing new rules to protect drinking water and track the amount of carbon dioxide stored underground by "clean coal" technology.

The rules, announced Monday, cover an experimental technique to store underground the carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants and other sources. The technique, which involves injecting carbon dioxide in stable geologic formations, is designed to reduce greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.

Lisa Jackson, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, said the rules clarify standards for carbon storage, so industry knows what is required as it develops the technology.

"We're taking a major step toward path-breaking innovations that will reduce greenhouse gases and put America in the forefront of the clean energy economy," Jackson said.

The administration wants to encourage carbon storage while overcoming liability obstacles that could hinder its development.

A sudden release of large amounts of carbon dioxide can kill by asphyxiation. Razz Razz Razz In 1986, 1,700 people died when a cloud of carbon dioxide escaped from a volcanic lake in Cameroon.

In a report this summer, an administration task force advised against the government taking on unlimited liability for underground storage of carbon dioxide.

http://www.dailymail.com/News/NationandWorld/201011220766

SamCogar

Number of posts : 6238
Location : Burnsville, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28

Back to top Go down

A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he? Empty Re: A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he?

Post by Aaron Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:17 am

This is the problem when you have inexperience trying to run the government. In academia and/or government, where the majority of the Obama Administration spent their previous years, they 'theorize' this will work so they throw billions of dollars at it 'hoping' it will work. And if it fails as industry experts believe it will, oh well, you then try something else.

Belize anyone?
Aaron
Aaron

Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28

Back to top Go down

A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he? Empty Re: A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he?

Post by Stephanie Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:49 pm

My husband is ready.
Stephanie
Stephanie
Admin

Number of posts : 6556
Age : 60
Location : West Virginia
Registration date : 2007-12-28

https://gazzfriends.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he? Empty Re: A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum