It's Main Street's fault, too
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
It's Main Street's fault, too
George Will writes the truth. He also is correct that the financial system needs some sort of rescue, despites the public's understandable outrage over the bailout bill. Ironically, even if the bailout is successful, it will probably never be broadly popular, because it is human nature to disbelieve a threat was ever real if it never materialized.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/publics_fury_noted_now_is_time.html
Beneath Americans' perfunctory disapproval of government deficits lurks an inconvenient truth: They enjoy deficits, by which they are charged less than a dollar for a dollar's worth of government. Conservatives participate in this, even though deficits fuel government's growth by obscuring its cost.
The people can emulate the government because credit has been democratized. Democratization of everything is supposedly an unquestionable good, but a blizzard of credit cards (1.5 billion of them, nine per cardholder), subsidized loans and cheap money has separated the pleasure of purchasing from the pain of paying. Furthermore, the entitlement mentality fostered by the welfare state includes a felt entitlement to a standard of living untethered from savings.
Populism flatters the people, contrasting their virtue with the alleged vices of some minority -- in other times, Jews or railroad owners or hard money advocates; today, the villain is "Wall Street greed," which is contrasted with the supposed sobriety of "Main Street." When people on Main Street misbehave by, say, buying houses for more than they can afford to pay, they blame the wily knaves who made them do it.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/publics_fury_noted_now_is_time.html
Randall- Number of posts : 126
Registration date : 2008-02-18
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
Well Randall if you will permit me I would like to borrow the last few words from your article.
It is exactly what I have been trying to suggest to Aaron and others, but Will has a better way with words...
"Congress should disconnect from a public that cannot be blamed for being more furious about than comprehending of this opaque debacle. The public wanted catharsis, and respect for its center-right principles, and got both with Monday's House vote. It still needs protection against obliteration of the financial system."
p.s. didn't I read somewhere that he considers Palin a liteweight?
It is exactly what I have been trying to suggest to Aaron and others, but Will has a better way with words...
"Congress should disconnect from a public that cannot be blamed for being more furious about than comprehending of this opaque debacle. The public wanted catharsis, and respect for its center-right principles, and got both with Monday's House vote. It still needs protection against obliteration of the financial system."
p.s. didn't I read somewhere that he considers Palin a liteweight?
sodbuster- Number of posts : 1890
Location : wv
Registration date : 2008-09-05
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
And Aaron has been saying all along that "protection against obliteration of the financial system" can be accomplished WITHOUT wasting $700,000,000,000.00 of taxpayer money.
I even gave you a DEMOCRAT that believes the same thing and stated how and why THIS particular plan should fail and all you can do is point out that she has mis-spoke a couple of times.
Please.
I even gave you a DEMOCRAT that believes the same thing and stated how and why THIS particular plan should fail and all you can do is point out that she has mis-spoke a couple of times.
Please.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
Well Aaron I think you might be reading more into my comment about the Congresslady than I intended.
I just thot it fair to point out what appeared to be her tendency to be sloppy with her facts.
Which incidently I got from your article.
Also, although he is way too far right for my taste politically, I recognize G. Will is an intelligent and thoughtful commentator.
I just thot it fair to point out what appeared to be her tendency to be sloppy with her facts.
Which incidently I got from your article.
Also, although he is way too far right for my taste politically, I recognize G. Will is an intelligent and thoughtful commentator.
sodbuster- Number of posts : 1890
Location : wv
Registration date : 2008-09-05
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
Hello Randall,
I'm happy to see you. I was thinking of you just this morning and wondering if and when you'd be back.
I agree Main Street must share some of the blame. However, I honestly believe their burden of blame is far less than that of Wall Street and Congress.
What I strongly disagree with him on is that we need to rescue Wall Street or Main Street. What we need to do is to address the underlying causes of the crisis. That being, as a nation we are not living within our means, we have a private bank manipulating the market and printing money out of thin air, and far too many of our elected officials are con artists who are allowed to escape punishment for their crimes.
I have seen nothing in the current "bailout" plan, nor previous versions, to do any of these things. There is no talk of cutting spending. There is no discussion of an investigation of elected and appointed officials who for years lied and deceived and covered the mess up. There is no discussion about restoring to congress the role in our monetary system the Constitution mandates.
So the bailout is a disaster. It will solve nothing. It will stall things, but ultimately exacerbate the problems by allowing them to fester and driving this nation further into debt. There will be no improvements. We may get a sacraficial lamb or two to haul to trial. That's it.
In any event, I'm happy to see you.
I'm happy to see you. I was thinking of you just this morning and wondering if and when you'd be back.
I agree Main Street must share some of the blame. However, I honestly believe their burden of blame is far less than that of Wall Street and Congress.
What I strongly disagree with him on is that we need to rescue Wall Street or Main Street. What we need to do is to address the underlying causes of the crisis. That being, as a nation we are not living within our means, we have a private bank manipulating the market and printing money out of thin air, and far too many of our elected officials are con artists who are allowed to escape punishment for their crimes.
I have seen nothing in the current "bailout" plan, nor previous versions, to do any of these things. There is no talk of cutting spending. There is no discussion of an investigation of elected and appointed officials who for years lied and deceived and covered the mess up. There is no discussion about restoring to congress the role in our monetary system the Constitution mandates.
So the bailout is a disaster. It will solve nothing. It will stall things, but ultimately exacerbate the problems by allowing them to fester and driving this nation further into debt. There will be no improvements. We may get a sacraficial lamb or two to haul to trial. That's it.
In any event, I'm happy to see you.
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
sodbuster wrote:
I just thot it fair to point out what appeared to be her tendency to be sloppy with her facts.
Gaffes
While running for re-election in 2004, Kaptur compared Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda's religious extremism to that of Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys. [1][2]
In January 2008, during Ben Bernanke's House testimony, Kaptur confused the Fed chairman Ben Bernanke for Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to have been a former CEO of Goldman Sachs. Just as she quickly realized that Paulson was the former CEO of GS, Mr. Bernanke corrected her and said he was "the CEO of the Princeton Economics Department"[4]
Marcy Kaptur appeared on GMA on Sept. 30th concerning the financial crisis. She refuted proposed legislation by saying Hank Paulson was a "day trader" and "not a banker." Paulson was previously CEO of Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, having risen through the ranks as an investment banker.
Regarding the Green Mountain Boys comparison from her hometown paper, The Toledo Blade...
Kaptur is the target of a witch hunt
The right wing has sunk to a new low with its recent attack on Marcy Kaptur. The fact that media and local Republicans have managed to extract that Ms. Kaptur compares Osama bin Laden to our Founding Fathers from her comments in The Blade only highlights the narrow focus of their crusade. Can we say "witch hunt?"
Ms. Kaptur was merely pointing out that the motivation of modern terrorism is the same as that which supposedly led to the American Revolution. That motivation is and was religious belief. That is a fact that our history books have been spoon-feeding generations of U.S. school children. It would take only a modicum of reason for her attackers to realize that making that point was in no way an endorsement of the tactics employed by the bin Ladens of this world.
Americans tend to have a blind spot on all things American. Why is it such a stretch to believe that if our founders employed terrorist-like tactics in defeating the Native peoples of this land with war, starvation, illness, and outright theft of their land, that other factions would use the same methods to make their causes known?
Terrorism is wrong, no matter the ideal being enforced. Ms. Kaptur has been a staunch defender of this country and an outspoken critic of terrorism for her entire political career.
It worries me that Larry Kaczala considers Ms. Kaptur's citing of documented history "outrageous and sick." To distort her comments and question her loyalties is the only outrageous part of this controversy.
So how is this 'sloppy with her facts' Sherm?
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
My bad Sherm. What I posted wasn't a story from the Toldeo Blade, it was a letter to the editor.
Here is the story. I think you'll find you agree with her. And for the record, she did vote against the Iraq War Resolution.
Here is the story. I think you'll find you agree with her. And for the record, she did vote against the Iraq War Resolution.
Threat of war spurs U.S. soul-searching
Mix of politics, religion is strong, Kaptur warns
By DAVID YONKE
BLADE RELIGION EDITOR
Before launching a military strike against Iraq, Americans should consider their own history to remember how powerful the mix of religion and politics can be, U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D., Toledo) said.
"If you think back to our founding as a country, we are a country of revolution," Miss Kaptur said in an interview this week.
She and the Rev. Jim Bacik, pastor of Toledo’s Corpus Christi University Parish, will speak at a workshop Friday for local Catholic leaders titled "Preaching and Teaching Peace in the Face of War."
When America "cast off monarchical Britain" in 1776, it involved the help of many religious people who had fled repression in other countries, the 11-term Toledo congressman said. Among the nontraditional American revolutionaries were the Green Mountain Boys, a patriot militia organized in 1770 in Bennington, Vt., to confront British forces, she said.
"One could say that Osama bin Laden and these non-nation-state fighters with religious purpose are very similar to those kind of atypical revolutionaries that helped to cast off the British crown," Miss Kaptur said.
In Iraq and other Arab nations where revolutions are potentially brewing, religious fervor will play a vital role in shaping political events, she said, and the United States must be careful "not to get caught in the crossfire."
"I think that one thing that people of faith understand about the world of Islam is that the kind of insurgency we see occurring in many of these countries is an act of hope that life will be better using Islam as the only reed that they have to lean on.
"I think that people of faith understand that for many of the terrorists, their actions are acts of sacred piety to the point of losing their lives. And I think that people of faith understand that there is a heavy religious overtone to the opposition."
If the United States ousts Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and seizes the land, it would not resolve the underlying problems leading to political and social upheaval, she said.
"Even if we take the ground, we do not share the culture," she said, "and in the end we have to learn to coexist in a world with religious states that we may not agree with and find ways to cooperate."
Miss Kaptur, a lifelong member of Toledo’s Little Flower Catholic Parish, said her political and moral views were influenced by her family’s tradition of Roman Catholicism and service in the U.S. Marine Corps and Army infantry.
"Our tradition is to exhaust all reasonable means before one goes to war because our family, like so many others in our area, knows the price of war," she said.
The standards of the "Just War Theory," developed by Saint Augustine in the 4th Century, are not clearly defined in the present U.S.-Iraq showdown, Miss Kaptur said.
"I think that’s why there is so much angst and division over this because we’re in the gray area here," she said. "People of religious tradition are making their voices be heard very loudly on this one. I think there’s sort of an instinctual sense that something isn’t right here, and while they know there is a problem they are not sure that war is the solution."
The Catholic tradition calls for embracing the poor and the dispossessed, Miss Kaptur said. Rather than initiating military action, the United States should try to counter the poverty and repression that breed terrorism in the Mideast.
"I think food and education will help stem the poverty of the young people who are being drawn into terrorism every day," she said.
"The reason I think this is such an important moment in history is because the United States cannot become the target of the anguish of the dispossessed in the most undemocratic region of the world."
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
Beats me.
I wasnt referring to the green mt. boys statement.
I'm sure she is a nice lady.
I wasnt referring to the green mt. boys statement.
I'm sure she is a nice lady.
sodbuster- Number of posts : 1890
Location : wv
Registration date : 2008-09-05
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
You are right she is talking my lingo in the Yonke article.
Maybe I will agree with her before all is said and done on the bailout/rescue.
But right now I am conflicted.
If I was there and had to vote I mite vote "present"...lol
Maybe I will agree with her before all is said and done on the bailout/rescue.
But right now I am conflicted.
If I was there and had to vote I mite vote "present"...lol
sodbuster- Number of posts : 1890
Location : wv
Registration date : 2008-09-05
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
I didn't mean to hijack the thread. I was merely responding to a direct comment.
As for the thread, I agree with Will that main street has responsibility in this crisis as well which is why I do not favor using taxpayer money being used to keep individuals in homes they never had business purchasing to begin with. I'm also opposed to bankruptcy courts re-writing mortgages to keep people in homes as well.
If a bank or investment firm wants to negotiate with a homeowner, that is their business but I do not believe that taxpayer money should be used to keep people in homes.
As for how they will pay, that will happen the same way it always has for those who don't pay their bills and that is increased interest rates if they can find someone willing to finance them.
All Paulson's plan will do is continue the same bad lending practices and Americans living beyond their means and those two are two of the central reasons for this crisis. Why should we as taxpayers validate those bad practices by financing bad choices by BOTH Wall Street and Main Street?
As for the thread, I agree with Will that main street has responsibility in this crisis as well which is why I do not favor using taxpayer money being used to keep individuals in homes they never had business purchasing to begin with. I'm also opposed to bankruptcy courts re-writing mortgages to keep people in homes as well.
If a bank or investment firm wants to negotiate with a homeowner, that is their business but I do not believe that taxpayer money should be used to keep people in homes.
As for how they will pay, that will happen the same way it always has for those who don't pay their bills and that is increased interest rates if they can find someone willing to finance them.
All Paulson's plan will do is continue the same bad lending practices and Americans living beyond their means and those two are two of the central reasons for this crisis. Why should we as taxpayers validate those bad practices by financing bad choices by BOTH Wall Street and Main Street?
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
sodbuster wrote:Beats me.
I wasnt referring to the green mt. boys statement.
I'm sure she is a nice lady.
I'm just curious as to how she was sloppy with her facts, which was your statement.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
My understanding of the rescue bill is it will not prevent foreclosures but will buy up some of the bundled bad paper at firesale prices through a reverse auction.
The gvt will announce it is in the mkt for x number of dollars' worth of the bundles and let everyone bid how low they will go i.e. 50 cents on dollar, etc. and the gvt buys the low bid...
The gvt will announce it is in the mkt for x number of dollars' worth of the bundles and let everyone bid how low they will go i.e. 50 cents on dollar, etc. and the gvt buys the low bid...
sodbuster- Number of posts : 1890
Location : wv
Registration date : 2008-09-05
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
"In January 2008, during Ben Bernanke's House testimony, Kaptur confused the Fed chairman Ben Bernanke for Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to have been a former CEO of Goldman Sachs. Just as she quickly realized that Paulson was the former CEO of GS, Mr. Bernanke corrected her and said he was "the CEO of the Princeton Economics Department"[4]
Marcy Kaptur appeared on GMA on Sept. 30th concerning the financial crisis. She refuted proposed legislation by saying Hank Paulson was a "day trader" and "not a banker." Paulson was previously CEO of Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, having risen through the ranks as an investment banker."
Not a big deal.
Just kinda made me raise my eyebrows.
But after seeing her attitude on the war I can look over that.
Her opinion matters more to me now that I read that.
Marcy Kaptur appeared on GMA on Sept. 30th concerning the financial crisis. She refuted proposed legislation by saying Hank Paulson was a "day trader" and "not a banker." Paulson was previously CEO of Goldman Sachs, an investment bank, having risen through the ranks as an investment banker."
Not a big deal.
Just kinda made me raise my eyebrows.
But after seeing her attitude on the war I can look over that.
Her opinion matters more to me now that I read that.
sodbuster- Number of posts : 1890
Location : wv
Registration date : 2008-09-05
Re: It's Main Street's fault, too
I agree with her. Paulson's a day trader. And I think his only interest here is what's best for wall street, not main street. This is a man who got his own golden parachute and is worth some $700 million dollars.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Similar topics
» Main Street's soaring sour loans
» Not His Fault
» If it's all the Unions' fault....
» Boosh's fault!
» Not His Fault
» If it's all the Unions' fault....
» Boosh's fault!
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum