Federal Judge Asked to Clarify Object to Obamacare
Page 1 of 1
Federal Judge Asked to Clarify Object to Obamacare
Reuters led with the headline: Judge won't block implementation of healthcare law
Okay. What does that mean?
The Judge gave DOJ seven days to appeal. If not, the twenty-six states suing for relief from it may proceed as if there were no mandate. How is this not blocking implementation?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/01/obamacare-unconstitutional-federal-judge-roger-vinson-florida-1.html
I believe the entire text of Judge Vinson's opinion in included in the link above.
Okay. What does that mean?
Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire Act must be declared void.
The Judge gave DOJ seven days to appeal. If not, the twenty-six states suing for relief from it may proceed as if there were no mandate. How is this not blocking implementation?
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2011/01/obamacare-unconstitutional-federal-judge-roger-vinson-florida-1.html
I believe the entire text of Judge Vinson's opinion in included in the link above.
ohio county- Moderator
- Number of posts : 3207
Location : Wheeling
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Similar topics
» A Federal Judge could rule 'No Liability', couldn't he?
» Obama speech undercuts federal charge for judge's murder
» Federal Judge Prohibits Prayer at Texas Graduation Ceremony
» Unidentified Object that never got off the ground
» Hillary Asked......
» Obama speech undercuts federal charge for judge's murder
» Federal Judge Prohibits Prayer at Texas Graduation Ceremony
» Unidentified Object that never got off the ground
» Hillary Asked......
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum