John McCain chooses female running mate. Liberals furious.

I watched the Couric interview online yesterday. Palin was atrocious. I don’t know which part was worse, the question about the magazine (all of them was her answer) or the question about McCain reforms (I’ll get back to you on that one).

I still think at the very least, the debate is a draw.

Aaron,

You need to cool your jets. Get a girlfriend, or something.

Did you read my link where she says man walked the earth the same time as dinosaurs and she saw a pic of a man track inside a dino track?

And after saying she opposed Roe v wade they asked her to name another SC case and she could not???

Hey I am not too keen on Obama but if McCain does not jettison her he might lose 40 states.

I didn't find Joe's on his campaign page but he did say he was a Roman Catholic on MTP and the last time I checked, RC's are considered christians.

By whom?

Should I not believe Joe either Frank?

If he says he's Catholic, you can believe him if you want to. All that takes is church membership- like being a Methodist. But if he goes to claiming that he's a "Christian", then I will re-double and triple my scrutiny of him.

Stephanie wrote:Aaron,

You need to cool your jets. Get a girlfriend, or something.

Or even just a magazine.

You hate Sarah (she's hot) Terry and you're listening to your heart so you're not giving her a chance in the debate.

I don't like her stances on civil liberties but, as I told you after her Couric interview, I now feel sorry for her. I STILL don't want her a heart attack away from the White House.

As to her debate skills:

"She has an amazing ability to turn a 45 second answer into a folksy story... she's never been forced to know the issues."

This small-town folksy alienation of her opponents will not work on a national scale.

TerryRC wrote:
This small-town folksy alienation of her opponents will not work on a national scale.

Who is the current President???

Stephanie wrote:Aaron,

You need to cool your jets. Get a girlfriend, or something.

I already have 3. Why do I need another?

Who is the current President???

With <30% popularity, I'm thinking we, as a country, have learned our lesson on that issue.

Aaron wrote:

Stephanie wrote:Aaron,

You need to cool your jets. Get a girlfriend, or something.

I already have 3. Why do I need another?

Oh, well then you don't need a magazine after all.

Just some Vitamin E maybe.

Ditch them. Get one who can take care of your needs, man.

Sheeesh.

Do I have to tell you everything?

With <30% popularity, I'm thinking we, as a country, have learned our lesson on that issue.

Although it does show that 30% of people polled are crazy.

You know, the definition of crazy that is "repeating the same action, over and over while expecting a different result".

You give the populace more credit then I do.

Combined, they take care of pretty much everything.

If only I could roll them all into one.

Other then being really fat...

sodbuster wrote:Did you read my link where she says man walked the earth the same time as dinosaurs and she saw a pic of a man track inside a dino track?

Hey I am not too keen on Obama but if McCain does not jettison her he might lose 40 states.

All birds are direct decendents of dinosaurs ....... so there must have been a few dinosaur species around when man first started walking the earth 6 million +- years ago.

Dummy, if all the dinosaurs went extinct ........ there would be no birds a walking or flying around today.

And here dummy, you can take a look at the picture that Palin seen, was shown.

I am sure that if Palin was a Democrat you would not be badmouthing her because she was told an untruth about a picture. It appears someone pulled a Ziggy on her. She was told something about a photograph that was an untruth, but not necessarily a blatant lie unless the person showing her knew better.

Taylor Site, Paluxy Riverbed, 1984, Glen Rose, TX
The Taylor Site contains several trackways of largely infilled, metatarsal dinosaur footprints once considered human by many creationists, and a trail of deeper, more typical digitigrade dinosaur tracks. Photograph (C) 1984, Glen J. Kuban

.

TerryRC wrote:
This small-town folksy alienation of her opponents will not work on a national scale.

It sure as hell should work on the folksy people in the small towns across America who will comprise the majority of all voters come this November.

Course there might be a major catastrophic collapse of our economy such as they are predicting ....... and if so, ....... Bush just might have to postpone the 2008 General Election until next year or later.



.

It sure as hell should work on the folksy people in the small towns across America who will comprise the majority of all voters come this November.

You mean the ones that look at anything more than a HS diploma as "elitist".

Color me surprised...

TerryRC wrote:You know, the definition of crazy that is "repeating the same action, over and over while expecting a different result".

The majority of WV voters have been doing that for more than 70 years.

TerryRC wrote:It sure as hell should work on the folksy people in the small towns across America who will comprise the majority of all voters come this November.

You mean the ones that look at anything more than a HS diploma as "elitist".

Color me surprised...

In many parts of this country the defination for elitist is someone who has the constant need to show their boogers.

In many parts of this country the defination for elitist is someone who has the constant need to show their boogers.

Um, yeah?

What's a defination?

I KNEW you would take the bait.

Thank you for proving my point.

Right.

"Umm... Pharaoh? I MEANT for the Sphinx to be nose less, anyway..."

Firefox has an auto spellchecker. Use it.

Grammar, spelling and vocabulary DO reflect on the validity of someone's arguments, whether you want to recognize that or not.

I'm against ebonics, also.

wHy do I nead spullchacker. It'z beon prvoen taht if teh brane sees surtan wrdos and lttres, it can recognize what is meant.

Clear?

TerryRC wrote:Grammar, spelling and vocabulary DO reflect on the validity of someone's arguments,

Why. Is my point less valed if I missspeel a word Turry?

For instance, if I said I thought you were a pompous arrogant ass who believes you’re better then everyone else simply because of your degree from We give’emaway University, would my misspelling either pompos or arrowagant make you’re condescending attitude any less odious then it already is?

For instance, if I said I thought you were a pompous arrogant ass who believes you’re better then everyone else simply because of your degree from We give’emaway University, would my misspelling either pompos or arrowagant make you’re condescending attitude any less odious then it already is?

You are entitled to your opinion.

Want to make up some bogus statistics to back it up, all of the while toting your "amateur expert" status?

If you want to write, talk and spell like an uneducated boob, that is your business.

My attitude is odious to you because you can't win an argument with me.

How does it feel to get licked from someone with a degree from "We give’emaway University" (nobody gives Master's degrees away, FYI)?

Does it sting?