Bad News for Bush Haters
+7
ziggy
TerryRC
Randall
shermangeneral
Aaron
SheikBen
SamCogar
11 posters
Page 12 of 12
Page 12 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
You duck questions when the answers show the truth, which is generally how wrong you are. Hell, on one response, you argued BOTH sides of the argument. I often wonder if you actually have any core values or set thinking or if you just 'wing' it day to day. The problem is, the older you get the more you forget so you don't know what you argued a week ago. That is why you duck so many questions.
To answer this particular question, Caperton was no more a Republican then you are Frank.
To answer this particular question, Caperton was no more a Republican then you are Frank.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
You duck questions when the answers show the truth, which is generally how wrong you are.
So why do you duck questions?
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
The problem is, the older you get the more you forget so you don't know what you argued a week ago.
Apparently you are seeing things that no one else here is seeing.
So show us.
Last edited by ziggy on Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
I would but the search on this forum sucks. Literally, it sucks. You can put in a key word and hit search, even adding the author and it still comes back no results. You guys need to look into that.
My only other option would be to go back through individual post or over many pages and frankly Frank, you ain't worth that kind of time.
And the only questions I don't answer is your's and that's usually because they're trick or loaded questions. I'm not the only person that thinks so. If I'm not mistaken (and we both know I'm not) another poster accused you of the exact same thing about a week back.
Any more non-loaded questions?
My only other option would be to go back through individual post or over many pages and frankly Frank, you ain't worth that kind of time.
And the only questions I don't answer is your's and that's usually because they're trick or loaded questions. I'm not the only person that thinks so. If I'm not mistaken (and we both know I'm not) another poster accused you of the exact same thing about a week back.
Any more non-loaded questions?
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
ziggy wrote:(Aaron)- The problem is, the older you get the more you forget so you don't know what you argued a week ago.
Apparently you are seiing things that no one else here is seeing.
So show us.
Aaron wrote:I would but the search on this forum sucks. Literally, it sucks. You can put in a key word and hit search, even adding the author and it still comes back no results. You guys need to look into that.
My only other option would be to go back through individual post or over many pages and frankly Frank, you ain't worth that kind of time.
We knew you couldn't. You could make a fortune by self-powering your own hot air baloon.
And the only questions I don't answer is your's and that's usually because they're trick or loaded questions. I'm not the only person that thinks so. If I'm not mistaken (and we both know I'm not) another poster accused you of the exact same thing about a week back.
Who? Sheik Ben? He didn't accuse me of anything. He did ask me if I was asking a loaded question. When I explanied to him how I wasn't, he accepted what I said on face value and we proceeded with a discussion.
How is it a "loaded question" to ask how Arch Moore would or should have gotten the state out of the economic hole he put it in had he been re-elected in 1988? It's not like the state legislature pushed him into a political corner. The state legislature almost always gave Arch Moore everything he asked for.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
There's no coudn't to it. I'm telling you, you're not worth the effort of doing the research Frank.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
We knew you couldn't. You're just blowing more hot air.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
ziggy wrote:Who? Sheik Ben? He didn't accuse me of anything.
Even you admit that you have a history of asking trick and loaded questions. I guess since Mike was making a statement, it wasn't an accusation, huh Frank.
At any rate, you ask why I avoid questions, I explained it.
Any more un-loaded questions?
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
As for Arch, there's lots of things he COULD have done. But as he's not a democrat, I doubt his first response would have been to raise taxes as Caperton's was.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Aaron wrote:ziggy wrote:Who? Sheik Ben? He didn't accuse me of anything.
I guess since Mike was making a statement, it wasn't an accusation, huh Frank.
Here's is how it went down, starting here:
ziggy wrote:By the way, does the Bible proscribe human cannabalism?
https://gazzfriends.forumotion.com/religion-f11/franklin-graham-peppered-obama-about-ties-to-islam-t1156-105.htm
Where is the "accusation"? He even expressed disappointment that I wasn't asking him about what he first thought I was, to wit:
.SheikBen wrote:ziggy wrote:That I "didn't deny it" means nothing.
But if it helps you feel better, I was not trying to set you up. The question came to mind as the discussion was about eating the flesh of various creatures.
I was rather hoping that you were. Oh well.
I think it's Hitchens who goes from discussions of cannibalism to criticisms of the Lord's Supper. That you weren't going there is my mistake.
You are so full of it, Aaron.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Whatever you say Frank. I'll just note that you knew EXACTLY what I was talking about as soon as you read it. As far as I'm concerned, you proved my point for me.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
You never did answer the question...
and it's not even loaded.
and it's not even loaded.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Aaron wrote:Whatever you say Frank. I'll just note that you knew EXACTLY what I was talking about as soon as you read it. As far as I'm concerned, you proved my point for me.
Thanks.
All I "proved" is that you are fuller and fuller of it every day.
Aaron wrote:...................... The problem is, the older you get the more you forget so you don't know what you argued a week ago.
One must have a mighty weak self-image to be afraid that this old, forgetful dumbass Ziggy could trick anyone with "loaded" questions.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
The question was How many Republicians would come into office and immediately institute a tax increase.
So how many do you know that would do that Frank?
Focus.
So how many do you know that would do that Frank?
Focus.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Your question does not exist in a vacuum. It exists in the context of what the governor who created or helped to create the financial crisis in the matter at hand, for example- could or would or should have done to abate that crisis, had he been re-elected.
How would or should Arch Moore have gotten the state out of the economic hole he put it in had he been re-elected in 1988? It's not like the state legislature pushed him into a political corner. The state legislature almost always gave Arch Moore everything he asked for.
Had Arch Moore even realized there was a financial crisis any more than his successor had during the election campaign. If so, why did he not make it a campaign issue?
Was Caperton the only one in the dark about how bad the state's financial cash flow situation had become?
Or did Caperton- as a Democrat who could not resist some primival, inherent urge to raise taxes- create a bogus crisis as an excuse to raise taxes? If we answer that question with a yes, then we must still ask why medical providers had declined to take state-funded employee medical insurance, or why a self-employed businessman would dare go to the governor's mansion gate and physically remove the gate and take it away for non-payment, or why the state government telephone and gas bills had not been paid.
So you see, it is not all so simple as a partisan question of what did or would have some Republican done- except for partisans whose only context of reality is the flash of a single political moment. Someone might even whine and suggest that yours is a "loaded" question. But I would never be so cynical nor so lacking of self-confidence.
How would or should Arch Moore have gotten the state out of the economic hole he put it in had he been re-elected in 1988? It's not like the state legislature pushed him into a political corner. The state legislature almost always gave Arch Moore everything he asked for.
Had Arch Moore even realized there was a financial crisis any more than his successor had during the election campaign. If so, why did he not make it a campaign issue?
Was Caperton the only one in the dark about how bad the state's financial cash flow situation had become?
Or did Caperton- as a Democrat who could not resist some primival, inherent urge to raise taxes- create a bogus crisis as an excuse to raise taxes? If we answer that question with a yes, then we must still ask why medical providers had declined to take state-funded employee medical insurance, or why a self-employed businessman would dare go to the governor's mansion gate and physically remove the gate and take it away for non-payment, or why the state government telephone and gas bills had not been paid.
So you see, it is not all so simple as a partisan question of what did or would have some Republican done- except for partisans whose only context of reality is the flash of a single political moment. Someone might even whine and suggest that yours is a "loaded" question. But I would never be so cynical nor so lacking of self-confidence.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
I think the question we should be asking is why the legislature and the governors, democrats and Republicans alike, put us in the financial crisis we've been in for as long as I can remember and what our biggest problem is. Seems to me that it's under funded pension plans that legislatures keep passing to keep getting elected is what is causing the bulk of the problems. Am I wrong?
Manchin is the first governor that I can recall who said before we pass a liability, let's ensure what the true cost is going to be and access it from that point, not what the teachers union or the state workers or the Police unions or judges want, but what the true cost is.
We as a state have pushed out way too much coal to be a poor state and like it or not, as democrats have had control of this state for almost 80 years, it is democrats who must shoulder the bulk of the blame.
That is not partisan politics; like it or not, that is simply how it is.
Manchin is the first governor that I can recall who said before we pass a liability, let's ensure what the true cost is going to be and access it from that point, not what the teachers union or the state workers or the Police unions or judges want, but what the true cost is.
We as a state have pushed out way too much coal to be a poor state and like it or not, as democrats have had control of this state for almost 80 years, it is democrats who must shoulder the bulk of the blame.
That is not partisan politics; like it or not, that is simply how it is.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Aaron wrote:I think the question we should be asking is why the legislature and the governors, democrats and Republicans alike, put us in the financial crisis we've been in for as long as I can remember and what our biggest problem is. Seems to me that it's under funded pension plans that legislatures keep passing to keep getting elected is what is causing the bulk of the problems. Am I wrong?
No, you are not wrong- but that's not all there is to it. I would say it only slightly differently. I would say that it is ALL spending done without raising the funds to pay for it- not just pension funds- is what causes the defecits, the cash flow problems.
Manchin is the first governor that I can recall who said before we pass a liability, let's ensure what the true cost is going to be and access it from that point, not what the teachers union or the state workers or the Police unions or judges want, but what the true cost is.
We as a state have pushed out way too much coal to be a poor state and like it or not, as democrats have had control of this state for almost 80 years, it is democrats who must shoulder the bulk of the blame.
Okay. That is true. But was it any better when Republicans ran this state for the last third of the 19th century and the first third of the 20th century? What did those Republicans do to turn that coal into wealth for the state in general? And when Republicans do run for office even today, they don't offer anything new- just platitudes about a "better business climate", "running state government like a business", etc. But if any business had been run like state government was 1985-1989, its creditors would have forced it into bankruptcy, its assets liquidated and its executives officers likely jailed from fraud.
[b]That is not partisan politics; like it or not, that is simply how it is. [/b
And I think it is because, in West Virginia, their is but one political party- the Democrat-Republican party. There are no real choices other than the political twins Tweedle dee and Tweedle dum. And both Dee and Dum sell their political souls to coal for a couple pieces of silver, and so it's the same old same old- the state stays "poor" as a wealth of natural resources iis pushed out, day in and day out.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
If I'm wrong, tell me, what are we over committing ourselves on? WV has a balanced budget amendment so we can't overspend on anything else. Other then the pension programs, what else keeps adding to the deficit year after year after year?
And that you have to go back to the 19th century to put some blame on Republicans is just sad.
And that you have to go back to the 19th century to put some blame on Republicans is just sad.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
WV has a balanced budget amendment so we can't overspend on anything else.
But the balanced budget amendment does not keep us from acruing non-pension fund debt that we can't pay. By 1989 we saw that the state owed tens of millions of dollars of unpaid bills- unrelated to pension funds.
Other then the pension programs, what else keeps adding to the deficit year after year after year?
From 1985-1989 (and perhaps before then even) it was everything that the state had "purchased" that it did not have funds to pay for. We know that it included at least utility bills, health insurance bills, and the gate at the governor's mansion.
Every dollar that is spent on something isn't spent on something else. You want to talk about pension funds, then OK. Every dollar that is put into highways, into direct salaries, directly into bonds and other debt service, directly into law enforcement, directly into education and into everything else the state does isn't put into pension funds.
And that you have to go back to the 19th century to put some blame on Republicans is just sad.
So then how much better were things for West Virginians prior to 1933? Yes, it is sad that WV Democrats and Republicans are both such corrupt and inept managers of government.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
WV, with the exception of 20 years of governorship has been controlled exclusively by democrats for 75 years. Why do you feel the need to pass the blame equally among democrats and Republicans?
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Aaron wrote:WV, with the exception of 20 years of governorship has been controlled exclusively by democrats for 75 years. Why do you feel the need to pass the blame equally among democrats and Republicans?
Because the evidence is that they are equally crooked and/or inept.
Our friend Shermangeneral probably does not agree with that, but that's how I see it.
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
What evidence?
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Good grief Aaron dont tell me you are for affirmative action for republican office seekers.
If they cant get themselves elected more often quit whining and start writing checks to them.
Go door to door, stuff envelopes, etc.
But whining that you dont get your share of politicians elected wont do any good.
If they cant get themselves elected more often quit whining and start writing checks to them.
Go door to door, stuff envelopes, etc.
But whining that you dont get your share of politicians elected wont do any good.
shermangeneral- Number of posts : 1347
Location : Sherman, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-30
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Thank you Sherman for admitting the democrats shoulder the blame for the woeful conditions of this state. I know that's hard for a partisan like you.
Aaron- Number of posts : 9841
Age : 58
Location : Putnam County for now
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Re: Bad News for Bush Haters
Aaron wrote:shermangeneral wrote:Maybe you should ask about the episodes of clandestine meetings at the Charleston city dump and the stuffing of $100 bills in pockets while hunkered down in the car seat etc.?
Maybe her sources forgot that part.
(not to mention the bags of cash in the office drawers, etc.)
Here's a question for you Sherman.
Who exactly was Arch Moore paying all of this money to?
To a whole bunch of people, apparently.
During West Virginia's century-and-a-half history, which politician holds the all-time record for the most corruption scandals? It's former Gov. Arch Moore, by a mile.
Former Mingo County political boss Johnie Owens said Moore once lay down in the back seat of a car, to avoid being seen by passers-by, and "held up $12,000 and begged me to take it" to induce the county Democratic machine to support the Republican governor in an election.
Controversial coal operator Paul Kizer testified that he and Moore hid in a parked car at night behind Charleston's abandoned incinerator to agree on perjury they could tell to federal investigators.
Former campaign manager Tom Craig testified that Moore once handed him a ski cap containing $100,000 in wads of cash for illicit politicking.
Suspicions, investigations, indictments and finally prison tainted Moore for 20 years, damaging West Virginia. The Gazette was entwined in the process. The paper's late publisher, W.E. "Ned" Chilton III, personally filed an ethics complaint asking the State Bar to disbar the dishonest politician. Here's the long saga:
Back in 1970, midway in his first term as governor, Washington rumors said the Internal Revenue Service had recommended a tax-evasion indictment of Moore, but the Justice Department under Republican President Nixon and Attorney General John Mitchell scuttled it. The rumors faded, and Moore defeated Democrat Jay Rockefeller in the 1972 gubernatorial race.
In 1973, Moore's former attorney told me the tax-evasion case "was some turkey. It was peanuts - no good. It never should have been brought. We had it thrown out." The Gazette printed his sneer, knowing it would anger West Virginia IRS agents who originally performed the probe.
Sure enough, I got a surreptitious phone call from an agent in the regional IRS headquarters at Parkersburg. He asked me to meet him secretly in parked cars at a pull-off at the little Wood County town of Washington, south of Parkersburg.
In our furtive meeting, he said the tax evidence against Moore had been powerful, involving $200,000 in unreported income. He said the lawyer-politician had been executor of the estate of a crotchety hermit, and had found a signed, blank "certificate of assignment" in the hermit's safety box - so he wrote in stock numbers and gave himself 900 Exxon shares from the old man's assets. Also, he said, Moore converted $80,000 in campaign funds to personal use, and didn't report $6,000 from a land deal in which a mental defective was cheated out of a fair share.
Through a friendly stockbroker, the Gazette obtained a printout of Exxon stock transfers showing that Moore got 900 shares from the hermit, just as the IRS agent secretly said. When we printed this mess, I wrote that it came from a "Washington source," since the leak occurred at the tiny town of Washington.
As the 1970s proceeded, the Gazette revealed more Moore machinations - so many that the governor publicly dubbed the paper the "Morning Sick Call."
For example, we reported that Diversified Mountaineer Corp., a shady loan firm, lavished expensive entertainment on Moore's banking commissioner, George Jordan, and installed a bank vault in its Kanawha City building while awaiting approval of a state bank charter. Jordan was indicted in 1974 for falsifying state expense accounts, but the case later was dropped on a technicality.
In 1975, Ashland Oil executives confessed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that they had given $20,000 of corporation funds in cash, in a briefcase, to Moore in his office at the Capitol.
Perjury allegations rose after a nonunion Virginia trucking firm complained that it had won bidding to haul the state's liquor, but the contract abruptly was revoked. In a lawsuit, the governor testified that he knew nothing about the cancellation - but former Teamsters Union local President Eugene Carter testified that he had called Moore and asked him to void the contract.
In 1975, Moore and his top aide, William Loy, were indicted on federal charges of taking a $25,000 payoff from Diversified Mountaineer's crooked president. Banking Commissioner Jordan was named a co-conspirator. During their 1976 trial, Moore's attorney said in bench conferences that Moore had received $120,000 in unreported cash in the 1972 election. U.S. Attorney John "Jack" Field III said the amount was $180,000 - including a $5,000 blank check that was cashed with the mysterious signature "Amos Jones." A jury acquitted Moore and Loy. The Diversified Mountaineer chief later went to prison.
In 1976, Moore quietly gave West Virginia's license plate contract without bids to an Arkansas businessman with a record of bribe-paying.
In 1977, three days before he left office at the end of his second term, Moore released the Pittston Co. from liability in the historic Buffalo Creek disaster that drowned 125 Logan Countians and left 4,000 homeless. His action left West Virginia taxpayers stuck with a $9.5 million flood cleanup debt to the U.S. Corps of Engineers that finally was paid in 1989. During a lawsuit over the debt, U.S. Judge Norman Ramsey ruled that part of Moore's testimony was untrue.
In 1977, on his final day in office, Moore had the state pay $127,500 for a collection of John Brown papers previously valued at $50,000, and two of his ex-aides got a $30,000 commission on the sale.
In 1979, Moore's former alcohol commissioner, Richard Barber, was charged with squeezing campaign money and free booze from distillers. Barber told FBI agents he got more than $50,000 from liquor firms during the 1972 campaign and took it to Moore. Barber was sentenced to three years in federal prison.
In 1989, during the fraud trial of Marrowbone Coal Co. executives, witnesses testified that $80,000 was given to a company engineer, reportedly to be delivered to Moore administration officials to speed up coal permits.
Suddenly, in 1990, Moore pleaded guilty to federal charges of extortion, tax evasion, mail fraud and obstruction of justice. He confessed that he took $573,000 from Beckley coal mogul Paul Kizer in return for giving Kizer's firm a $2 million refund from the state black lung fund. He also admitted getting $50,000 from Marrowbone, and more from others.
Moore was sentenced to nearly six years in federal prison and was fined $170,000. Then, weirdly, the ex-governor tried to withdraw his guilty plea. His attempt went to the U.S. Supreme Court, where it failed. He served almost half his jail time, then returned to his Northern Panhandle home, Glen Dale. He appears occasionally at Republican events.
Moore was a charismatic figure with strong leadership ability - but his career ended in dismal disgrace.
http://www.wvgazette.com/Opinion/JamesA.Haught/200808040509?page=1&build=cache
ziggy- Moderator
- Number of posts : 5731
Location : Jackson County, WV
Registration date : 2007-12-28
Page 12 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» Not to be read by any Bush Haters
» Study confirms Bush Haters Help U.S. Enemies
» Bush/Gore and Bush/Kerry Polls Should Give McCain Hope
» HAMAS: HATERS OF ISRAEL
» Study confirms Bush Haters Help U.S. Enemies
» Bush/Gore and Bush/Kerry Polls Should Give McCain Hope
» HAMAS: HATERS OF ISRAEL
Page 12 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum