Palin Hints At Independent Conservative Movement

Everyone knows Sarah Palin is a "no-brainer", I dont really think anyone is scared of her.. lol
The tea parties are a bunch of senior citizens that cant figure out they are already on Government health care. Yelling, screaming and biting off the fingers of the people who are feeding them....

If no one is afraid of her, why is liberals attacking her daily 10 months AFTER the election ended?

Can you honestly tell me you think this woman will ever be elected president?
You need to do some drive-by's....lol

Considering that EVERY time I ask a liberal why they keep attacking her so long after the election and what they are afraid of and they're too scared to even answer the question, yes, I can see her winning the Presidency.

So why do you refuse to answer the question of why you're so afraid of her?

No one attacks her., she constantly makes a fool of herself and the media picks it up on a slow news day,

Hacker wrote:No one attacks her., she constantly makes a fool of herself and the media picks it up on a slow news day,

Partisan Democrats think and believe that everyone is "a fool" that doesn't agree 105% with everything they tell them.

Do you really believe that idiotic statement Hacker?

Tell me, do you think she is smart?
Aaron, I think I answered your question. I'll just plainly put it forth.. No, I am not scared of her... gimme' a break!

You stated no one attacks her. Does that mean David Letterman is no one? Or is Keith Olberman no one? How about anyone that works for MSNBC, are they no one? Matt Lauer, no one?

You may not be afraid of her and you may not think she's smart but the leaders of the left wing of your party don't share your opinion.

As they will not repeat the mistake they made in 2000 and 2004, they are definitely afraid of her and what she stands for. As such, they will not underestimate her or the conservatives of America, as you do, because they know to do so will do nothing but guarantee another loss for liberals.

And yes, I think she's smart. But as Obama has proven beyond all doubt, that doesn't qualify one to be a leader.

Aaron, they arent attacking her, their making fun of her.

You can think that if you like. Of course you're wrong but then that's your prerogative.

I grow very weary of the left's continued accusations of Republican stupidity. For whatever reason they revel in calling other people stupid. It gets old. Palin proved herself unfit for prime time, to be sure, and Bush could say some unfortunate things. But the "I'm smarter than you" leitmotif is beyond a turn off and is going to get some Republicans elected.

Hacker wrote:Aaron, they arent attacking her, their making fun of her.

I grow very weary of the left's continued accusations of Republican stupidity. For whatever reason they revel in calling other people stupid.

I'm a little weary of it too, Mike. I'm willing to bet my eye teeth Sarah Palin knows the difference between "they're and their" and uses them appropriately, though.

Stephanie: You could be right about the "they're and their".

A few semesters ago I was teaching Western Political Philosophy and my students butchered "they're" "their" and "there" on their papers. I gave them a quick primer and a very cordial and lighthearted scolding, and in turn on their finals they kept using, gratuitously, "their" "there" and "they're," the most enterprising in the same sentences.

Reasons Why the English Language is Hard to Learn
http://mistupid.com/facts/page016.htm

And yet one liberal’s biggest complaints about Palin are that she is stupid because of her speech. I do believe you've asserted this.

More do as I say, not as I do liberalism?

SheikBen wrote:Palin proved herself unfit for prime time, to be sure, ......

Mike, your above statement kinda surprised me.

I'm curious as to what your criteria was for making said judgment.





.

Hi Sam,

By unfit for prime time, unable to expect and then handle the kind of shenanigans played by media outlets, and a certain lack of eloquence necessary for someone spending time on national television.

The tragedy of 2008 is that the election was not one of ideas but rather platitudes, and the side that was best at handling the media (which was itself complicit and clearly rooting for them) was the side that won.

I think she was a bit young and a bit naive and the biggest travesty is that McCain’s aids didn't adequately prepare her for the ensuing firestorm that hit her full force in late August, early September.

I said when the election was over that if she were to find her a handler, worked on her speech and made sure she had the proper advisors for current avents, she would be a force to be reckoned with. I still think that but were I advising her, I would approach 2012 very carefully with more of an eye for 2016 to run as it will be hard to dethrone the Great Orator in the next election.

As has been the case, every fault of his pointed out will be turned into chants or racism and the media will eat it up full force.

Aaron wrote:were I advising her, I would approach 2012 very carefully with more of an eye for 2016 to run as it will be hard to dethrone the Great Orator in the next election.

I disagree, Obama is a "one shot wonder".

But anyway, if he should last for a 2nd term, ..... who in their right mind would want the job in 2016.

Cleaning up after the 2nd wave of the Black Plague will be far worse to do than it was in Medieval Europe 600 years ago.

.

SheikBen wrote:Hi Sam,

and the side that was best at handling the media (which was itself complicit and clearly rooting for them) was the side that won.

GIMME A BREAK, Mike.

There was no "handling of the media", they were part n' parcel to it.

And no one in the McCain Camp or anyone else with a "loud voice" dared to violate protocol and call the media "liars and distorters", thus the gullible public believed what was said/written about Palin.

The media could have "painted" a picture of Jesus Christ as a Muslim "brother" to Obama and the same people would have swallowed it "hook, line and sinker".

They are all so engrossed in PC'ism that they have lost all touch with reality.

Like the fellow said, "I don't really care what is right or wrong, or what you think, ..... I got the microphone and that makes me right".



.

SamCogar wrote:

Aaron wrote:were I advising her, I would approach 2012 very carefully with more of an eye for 2016 to run as it will be hard to dethrone the Great Orator in the next election.

I disagree, Obama is a "one shot wonder".

But anyway, if he should last for a 2nd term, ..... who in their right mind would want the job in 2016.

Cleaning up after the 2nd wave of the Black Plague will be far worse to do than it was in Medieval Europe 600 years ago.

.

A lot of it will depend on what happens next year during the mid-terms. If Republicans can repeat 94 and semi-save us from Obama as the Contract with America did from Clinton then we may not be in as big a mess as we both think we will. Of course that will require a strong leader and I'm not sure John Boehner is up to the task.

If he's not or if Democrats hold the House and Obama does get a second term then I don't know where this country will be by 2016. Maybe we'll get lucky and Alaska will have seceded, global warming will have made Alaskan winters warmer and I'll move there. Either that or I'll find a less socialist country like France or Canada or some place where the tax burden is lower like Sweden or Denmark.

Anyone who claims they are able to see hundreds of thousands of gallons of rainwater clinging to the branches and leaves of the forest canopy should be careful at what they criticize.

And you are a lying fucking asshole.

I said that the canopy of a forest SLOWS the rate at which rainwater reaches streams.

Go peddle your idiocy somewhere else, Cogar.

BTW, I'm not a democrat, but your partisan ass just can't see that.

People that study silviculture agree with me.

Ok, here's one of dozens of stories you can find if you google "Palin McCain campaign boost."

And her trailer trash life took that boost away...

If she lied, then why did Senate Democrats immediately remove the provision from their version of the bill?

Citation, please...